Japan’s Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama stood at the Tokyo Stock Exchange on Jan. 5 and declared 2026 a “digital year,” framing traditional exchanges as the primary gateway for investors to access cryptoassets and ETF-like products.
As Elliptic noted, she pointed to US spot Bitcoin ETFs as a model, explicitly stating what Japan’s Financial Services Agency had been building toward: crypto was being pulled into the same institutional channels as equities and funds.
The timing matters because the policy architecture behind that statement, consisting of tax cuts, stablecoin licensing, and a wholesale reclassification of 105 cryptoassets as financial products, creates a clear regulatory pathway for institutional crypto exposure in Asia.
Additionally, buried in the mechanics of that shift is a second-order effect: XRP sits at the center of Japan’s existing crypto infrastructure, positioning it to capture a disproportionate share of the institutional flows these reforms are designed to unlock.
Policy stack
Japan’s FSA finalized plans to reclassify 105 major cryptoassets as “financial products” under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, moving them out of the lighter Payment Services Act regime.
Exchanges listing these assets face issuer-style disclosure, volatility, and blockchain risk reporting, and insider trading restrictions. The bill goes to the 2026 ordinary Diet session.
The same package reduces the effective tax rate on eligible crypto income from as high as 55% to a flat 20%, aligning crypto taxation with that of stock investments.
The FSA also advanced a yen-pegged stablecoin initiative that resulted in Japan’s first licensed JPY stablecoin, JPYC, while exploring ways to allow local banks to trade cryptocurrencies, much as they trade stocks and government bonds.
Put together, the changes to the policy stack are as described in the table below:
| Policy area | Policy change | What it does in practice | Implication for crypto markets | Timeline / status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asset classification | Reclassifies 105 major cryptoassets as “financial products” under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), instead of the lighter Payment Services Act regime | Brings targeted tokens into the same legal bucket as traditional securities, triggering issuer-style disclosure, volatility and blockchain-risk reporting, and insider-trading rules for exchanges that list them | Moves major tokens into the familiar securities-market framework, making it easier for brokers, exchanges, and institutions to treat leading coins like mainstream investable assets | Bill slated for submission to the 2026 ordinary Diet session |
| Exchange and issuer obligations | Imposes disclosure and risk-reporting duties on exchanges listing the reclassified assets | Requires detailed information on technology, market and governance risks, plus monitoring for abusive trading activity | Improves transparency and investor protection, giving institutional compliance teams more comfort around listing and holding large-cap cryptoassets | Comes into force with the 2026 FIEA amendment once passed and implemented |
| Tax treatment | Cuts effective tax on eligible crypto income from up to 55% to a flat 20%, in line with equity taxation | Aligns crypto capital gains with stock investments rather than high progressive income brackets | Lowers the friction for households, HNWIs and corporates to hold and trade crypto, and makes exchange-listed or fund-wrapped exposure more attractive on a risk-adjusted, after-tax basis | Included in the same reform package; designed to take effect alongside or shortly after the legal reclassification |
| Stablecoin regime | Advances a yen-pegged stablecoin framework that enabled Japan’s first licensed JPY stablecoin, JPYC | Provides a regulated path for issuing and using JPY-backed stablecoins within domestic markets | Creates native JPY liquidity rails for trading and settlement, paving the way for onshore stablecoin pairs and integration of crypto into payments and capital-markets infrastructure | Framework already in motion, with JPYC live as the first licensed JPY stablecoin |
| Bank and securities participation | Explores ways for local banks to trade cryptocurrencies in a manner similar to stocks and government bonds | Opens the door for banks and their securities arms to directly offer crypto dealing, custody and related services | Enlarges the set of regulated institutions that can intermediate crypto exposure, supporting deeper liquidity, more sophisticated products and institutional flows | Ongoing supervisory workstream linked to the broader 2026 reform and bank-level licensing decisions |
| Political and regulatory framing | Positions digital assets within the securities-market playbook, with stock and commodity exchanges as primary gateways for investors | Signals that crypto will be accessed mainly through regulated exchanges and securities-type products such as ETFs and structured notes | Anchors the long-term vision in traditional market infrastructure, clearing a path for exchange-listed crypto products, bank custody and broker-distributed exposure that can scale institutional participation | Articulated in recent government and ministry statements; provides the narrative and policy direction that the 2026 legal and tax changes are meant to operationalize |
Adoption gap
Chainalysis’ 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index ranks Japan 19th worldwide for overall crypto adoption. Yet, on the “institutional centralized service value received” sub-index, Japan falls to 27th.
Japanese consumers and high-net-worth users are engaged, but flows of $1 million or more through centralized venues lag grassroots activity.
Japan’s on-chain value received grew 120% in the 12 months to June 2025, outpacing India (99%), South Korea (100%), Indonesia (103%), and Vietnam (55%). Chainalysis links that growth to regulatory reforms, tax plans, and stablecoin licensing.
The critical detail: from July 2024 to June 2025, purchases of JPY on centralized exchanges went “predominantly into XRP,” with about $21.7 billion in XRP bought, versus roughly $4.7 billion in BTC and $2 billion in ADA.
The report explicitly suggests investors are betting on the “real-world utility of XRP” given Ripple’s strategic partnership with SBI Holdings.
The Japanese crypto industry is growing fast, institutions lag retail, and XRP dominates JPY on-ramp volume.
Why XRP captures the institutional pathway
The payments rail isn’t hypothetical. SBI Remit, part of SBI Holdings, has used Ripple’s payment technology since 2017. In 2021, it became the first Japanese remittance provider to use XRP as a bridge asset for Japan-Philippines transfers.
In 2023, SBI expanded that model so XRP now bridges remittances from Japan into bank accounts in the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia.
These aren’t pilot programs, but live corridors moving money across the region’s most active remittance routes.
On the stablecoin side, Ripple and SBI signed a memorandum of understanding in August 2025 for SBI VC Trade to distribute Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin domestically. The SBI-related firm is the first to hold Japan’s Electronic Payment Instruments Exchange Service Provider license.
The partnership targets institutional demand and emphasizes full US dollar backing, short-term Treasuries, and monthly attestations to meet regulatory expectations.
The ETF angle is tailor-made for this thesis.
In August 2025, SBI’s earnings materials outlined plans for Japan’s first dual-asset crypto ETF, pairing Bitcoin and XRP. SBI aims to launch “upon regulatory approval” in anticipation of the FSA’s reclassification of crypto as a financial product.
The Bitcoin-XRP ETF would list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. XRP shares top billing with Bitcoin in the institutional product design.
Recent research describes Japan as one of the most “Ripple-friendly” jurisdictions, with SBI Remit’s XRP corridors cited as examples of lower-cost, near-instant transfers and as a testbed for cross-border rails in Asia.
When regulators in Tokyo talk about “real-world utility” or “digital year” in the same breath as capital markets, XRP is one of the few assets already plugged into regulated institutions and payment flows.
How exposure actually reaches investors
Once the FSA’s proposals are enacted, those 105 cryptoassets will fall under FIEA, with disclosure, insider-trading controls, and product-governance rules similar to those for equities and funds.
That unlocks the existing machinery of Japanese finance: securities firms, banks’ securities arms, and exchange-listed products.
The Osaka Digital Exchange already operates START, Japan’s first secondary market for security tokens, which is funded by institutions such as SBI and major brokerages.
Policy work from Nomura Research Institute lays out the menu: investment trusts holding spot crypto, futures-based crypto funds, sale of foreign Bitcoin ETFs to domestic investors, and potential cross-listings of US products on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.
Overlay SBI’s plans for a Bitcoin-XRP ETF, SBI VC Trade’s role as a licensed crypto and stablecoin venue, and SBI Remit’s existing XRP rails.
The institutional pathway becomes clear: JPY savings and corporate cash can transform into regulated exposure to XRP through exchange-listed ETFs, investment trusts, or structured notes sitting on top of XRP liquidity on domestic exchanges.
What “more XRP liquidity” actually looks like
At the microstructure level, the easiest near-term effect shows up in JPY spot markets.
Tax cuts and a move into the securities law framework make it easier for brokers and wealth managers to recommend regulated crypto products.
For XRP, which already dominates JPY fiat on-ramp volume, that likely manifests as higher daily JPY/XRP traded volume, deeper order books, and tighter spreads versus USD pairs.
Chainalysis’ $21.7 billion figure for XRP/JPY inflows provides a baseline for comparison.
On the payments side, if Remit and its partners continue expanding corridors and if yen-backed stablecoins like JPYC or bank-issued tokens become standard settlement assets, XRP’s role as a bridge currency for regional remittances will strengthen. That creates a persistent two-way flow and liquidity in Asian trading hours.
The ETF and securities-wrapper layer represents the institutional inflection point.
If the Bitcoin-XRP ETF or a similar product is approved, XRP could see demand from pension funds, asset managers, and corporate treasuries that can only access assets through FIEA-compliant wrappers.
In practice, that appears as growth in ETF AUM, creation and redemption activity linked to XRP, and a larger share of global XRP volume routed through JPY-venue authorized participants.
Upside without the oversell
Japan is a fast-growing crypto market. Policy is shifting to treat major tokens as full financial products, with lower tax rates.
Regulators want exchanges and ETFs to serve as the access points. XRP is unusually entrenched in Japan due to JPY on-ramp dominance, SBI/Ripple’s remittance infrastructure, and proposed ETFs.
The caveats matter: no crypto ETFs have been approved yet, the FSA hasn’t publicly named XRP as a preferred asset, and liberalizing stablecoins could dilute some of XRP’s structural advantage in JPY flows as USDC and JPYC become more widely available.
But if Japan’s “digital year” pushes regulated exchanges and ETF wrappers to the center of crypto access, XRP is one of the few non-Bitcoin assets that already has both domestic policy alignment and real transactional use in Japan and across Asian remittance corridors.
The institutional gap Chainalysis identifies of 27th in institutional flows, despite 19th in overall adoption, represents the space these reforms are designed to fill.
When that gap closes, the assets that already sit inside Japan’s regulated financial plumbing, that already move real money across the region’s payment rails, and that already appear in proposed ETF structures have a structural head start. XRP fits that description in ways most tokens don’t.