MEXC frozen funds: a pseudonymous trader known as the White Whale escalated a social-media pressure campaign to $2.5M after alleging the exchange demanded in-person KYC in Malaysia to unfreeze $3.1M — investors should document communications and seek formal dispute channels with the exchange.
White Whale ups bounty to $2.5M
Trader alleges MEXC requested in-person KYC in Malaysia to release $3.1M.
Account review periods of 12 months cited by MEXC; other users report similar freezes and long reviews.
Meta description: MEXC frozen funds: White Whale raises social campaign to $2.5M after alleged in-person KYC request in Malaysia — learn steps to protect frozen assets now.
‘,
‘
🚀 Advanced Trading Tools Await You!
Maximize your potential. Join now and start trading!
‘,
‘
📈 Professional Trading Platform
Leverage advanced tools and a wide range of coins to boost your investments. Sign up now!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-bitget”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBitget”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBitget.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBitget[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBitget.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBitget”, sessperindex);
}
})();
What happened with the MEXC frozen funds?
MEXC frozen funds refers to a reported incident in which a pseudonymous trader, the White Whale, says MEXC froze roughly $3.1M of his personal assets in July 2025. The trader alleges the exchange later requested an in-person KYC verification in Malaysia and launched a $2.5M social-media campaign to pressure a resolution.
The White Whale initially announced a $2M bounty and added $500,000 — split between campaign participants and charity — after claiming MEXC required a one-year review before releasing funds.
How did MEXC respond to the freeze claims?
MEXC told media outlets that account restrictions are imposed by risk control rules, not profitability. A company spokesperson stated the 12-month review period applies to accounts flagged for coordinated violations, high-risk activity, or compliance concerns, and does not apply to all users.
‘,
‘
🔒 Secure and Fast Transactions
Diversify your investments with a wide range of coins. Join now!
‘,
‘
💎 The Easiest Way to Invest in Crypto
Dont wait to get started. Click now and discover the advantages!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-binance”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBinance”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBinance.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBinance[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBinance.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBinance”, sessperindex);
}
})();
The exchange’s statement, as reported by media outlets, framed these measures as standard risk-control procedures rather than punitive or arbitrary actions.
Why is in-person KYC unusual for CEXes?
In-person KYC requests are uncommon for centralized cryptocurrency exchanges. Typical KYC processes use online document uploads and verification tools. The White Whale’s claim that MEXC requested an in-person meeting in Malaysia diverges from industry norms and prompted the trader’s escalation.
Other users have reported comparable experiences. For example, a trader named Pablo Ruiz said his account was frozen and placed under a 365-day review, with $2,082,614 USDT inaccessible for months.
Ruiz posted that an email screenshot showed risk control completion while support still maintained the review was ongoing, citing internal contradictions and a lack of transparency.
‘,
‘
🔥 The Power of the TRON Ecosystem is Yours!
Click now to discover exclusive opportunities!
‘,
‘
💎 Profit Opportunities on the TRON Network
Join now to strengthen your investments!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-htx”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexHtx”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesHtx.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesHtx[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesHtx.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexHtx”, sessperindex);
}
})();
Confirm the request via official exchange support channels, insist on written instructions within the platform, and avoid sharing sensitive data outside verified portals. For unusual demands like in-person verification, request a formal compliance reference.
Options include filing complaints with local financial authorities, seeking a preliminary injunction through courts, and engaging legal counsel experienced in crypto custody disputes.
This case highlights growing friction between traders and centralized exchanges over account freezes and KYC procedures. MEXC frozen funds disputes underscore the need for clear exchange transparency and formal dispute channels. Investors should document communications, verify compliance requests through official channels, and consider regulatory avenues if internal reviews do not resolve access to assets.
Source: https://en.coinotag.com/white-whale-alleges-mexc-asked-in%E2%80%91person-kyc-to-unfreeze-3-1m-boosts-2-5m-social-campaign-solana-mentioned/