Sui and Aptos Address Compatibility Warning

SlowMist and ChainCatcher have issued security alerts regarding address mismatches between Sui and Aptos blockchains, underscoring risks to user assets.

The alerts are crucial as sending assets between these networks can lead to irretrievable losses, impacting users financially.

Main Content

SlowMist and ChainCatcher have issued security alerts regarding address mismatches between Sui and Aptos blockchains, underscoring risks to user assets.

Both Sui and Aptos addresses start with “0x” and are 66 characters long, posing a risk of confusion. SlowMist’s alerts emphasize that these addresses, while visually similar, are not interchangeable or convertible. ChainCatcher reiterated the need for increased awareness and caution in managing these blockchain addresses.

In response, security leaders like SlowMist’s “cosine” have urged users to double-check destination addresses before transacting. Community reactions call on wallet software developers to integrate warnings to avert such mishaps, advocating for improved user interface safeguards.

Yu Xian (Cosine), Co-founder, SlowMist, – “Users need to be aware that the private key corresponding to the Sui address cannot derive the same address on Aptos, and they cannot be converted to each other. For example, if you have Aptos and accidentally transfer to your Sui address, then the funds are lost…”

Address Precedents and Future Blockchain Standards

Did you know? Address confusions have historical precedents, similar to past Ethereum-based network mix-ups, showing the consistent need for clear blockchain identity standards.

According to CoinMarketCap, Sui (SUI) is currently priced at $2.87, with a market dominance of 0.30% and a fully diluted market cap of $28.75 billion. Its 24-hour trading volume decreased by 32.88%, while recent price changes show a drop of 4.78% in the last 24 hours and a rise of 30.31% over 90 days.

The Coincu research team anticipates that the issues surrounding Sui and Aptos addresses may prompt regulatory discussions about clearer blockchain standards. These address misalignments could lead to enhanced technical definitions for cryptocurrencies, focusing on user prevention protocols and improved interoperability.