Ripple CTO Slams Operation Chokepoint 2.0 as ‘Despicable Evil’

• Ripple CTO David Schwartz highlights the potential dangers of the government’s indirect regulation. 
• Indirect regulation could lead to First Amendment violations and Fourth Amendment evasion.
• Elon Musk posits that debanking someone for their political views should be considered a federal crime. 

Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO) David Schwartz criticized “Operation Chokepoint 2.0,” calling it a form of indirect government regulation. Schwartz argues that governments are pressuring banks and financial institutions to deny services to certain individuals or businesses, even without evidence of wrongdoing. In an X post, Schwartz condemned this practice as a “despicable evil” that undermines due process and the rule of law.

Indirect Regulation: An End Run Around Due Process?

Schwartz explained that indirect regulation occurs when the government holds one party liable for another’s criminal actions, even without actual knowledge or willful blindness. Essentially, it forces entities to ensure their lawful actions don’t inadvertently facilitate someone else’s unlawful activities.

He highlighted several dangers of this approach. First, it could hinder law enforcement’s ability to monitor suspicious transactions. Second, it denies individuals and businesses due process by allowing punishment without charges or a fair trial.

First and Fourth Amendment Concerns

Furthermore, Schwartz warned that indirect regulation could lead to First and Fourth Amendment violations. By pressuring entities to sever ties with individuals or businesses based on their speech, the government could indirectly punish protected speech. Additionally, compelling businesses to disclose information to avoid liability could circumvent Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Schwartz’s post comes amid rising concerns about Operation Chokepoint 2.0, which has reportedly led to numerous crypto companies losing banking services. Regulatory agencies like the SEC and the FDIC have allegedly pressured banks to distance themselves from crypto and tech companies, with over 30 platforms reportedly affected. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong criticized the Biden administration’s actions, saying, “It was one of the most unethical and un-American things that happened in the Biden administration, and my guess is we’ll find Elizabeth Warren’s fingerprints all over it.”

Read also: Coinbase vs. SEC & FDIC: ‘Intrepid Detective’ Grewal Digs Deeper

Separately, a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen sparked a discussion on X, asking if debanking someone based on political views constitutes a federal crime. Tech mogul Elon Musk agreed that it should.