Pi Network’s Open Mainnet Launch: Is the Long-Awaited Payoff Worth Six Years of Mobile Mining?

Pi Network’s Open Mainnet finally launched after 6 years, but centralization issues and limited adoption raise questions about whether the wait was worth it.

After six years of delays and promises, Pi Network finally launched its Open Mainnet on February 20, 2025, but serious questions remain about whether early adopters’ time investment will pay off given centralization concerns, limited exchange adoption, and unproven real-world utility.

The Moment of Truth Finally Arrives

Pi Network’s journey from ambitious Stanford experiment to live blockchain reached a pivotal milestone this past February. The project that promised to democratize cryptocurrency mining through smartphones officially opened its mainnet after multiple delays, enabling external connectivity and potential exchange listings for the first time

The numbers tell a story of massive scale: over 19 million users completed identity verification and 10.14 million migrated to the mainnet, exceeding the original 10 million goal. After launching at $2.00 Pi coin’s speculative price surged to $2.98 within a couple of days, then fell throughout March before becoming range bound around its current support level of $0.50.

The Reality Behind Six Years of Button-Tapping

Critics, including industry experts including Bybit CEO Ben Zhou and Cyber Capital Founder Justin Bons, have publicly questioned Pi Network’s legitimacy and business model. The fundamental critique centers on whether Pi’s mobile mining actually constitutes meaningful participation in a decentralized network.

Reports suggest that all mainnet nodes are operated centrally by the Pi Network team, undermining the decentralized ethos of blockchain technology. This revelation is particularly damaging given Pi’s promises of democratization and decentralization.

The mining mechanism itself has drawn skepticism. Pi’s mining mechanism provides little resemblance to traditional mining, with the button-tapping method suggesting the platform may prioritize data collection rather than delivering real value to its users.

To mine Pi, download the office app from either Google Play or the App Store

Exchange Adoption: A Critical Test

Despite its mainnet launch, major exchange adoption is yet to become widespread. Although Pi can be traded on some major exchanges including OKX, MEXC, Bitget and Gate, other exchanges such as Bybit have declined to list the token –  raising questions about institutional confidence. To that point, the absence of listings on crypto’s two biggest exchanges Binance and Coinbase is telling. These platforms typically require rigorous technical and regulatory vetting, and their hesitancy suggests underlying concerns about Pi Network’s architecture or compliance posture.

Privacy and Data Concerns Mount

Pi Network mandated Know Your Customer (KYC) verification for users to access their mined Pi tokens, creating a permissioned system that allows the central authority to potentially censor or restrict user access. While KYC is typically a ‘must do’ to open an exchange account and actively trade, it is not commonplace for the cryptocurrency itself to choose this path – although others, like Worldcoin, have required extensive personal data for users to access their tokens – also sparking privacy concerns.

Pi Network’s handling of KYC verification reveals a punitive system that suggests data harvesting priorities over genuine cryptocurrency development. The network imposed major penalties on users who failed to complete identity verification. It first threatened the forfeiture of years of mobile mining rewards except for coins earned in the final six months before migration.

What’s particularly telling is the pattern of deadline extensions – from the original December 31, 2024 cutoff to January 31, then February 28, and finally March 14, 2025 – which created artificial urgency while maximizing the window for data collection. It’s certainly arguable that the repeated extensions, coupled with severe consequences for non-compliance, indicate that Pi’s primary goal was building a comprehensive database of verified identities.

When the final deadline passed, users reported losing substantial holdings, with one ‘Pioneer’ forfeiting 10,000 PI tokens, demonstrating how the network prioritized identity harvesting over rewarding the very users who had spent years contributing to its growth through mobile mining.

And how safe is your data if you do complete the KYC verification? A Cointrust report highlighted that user data is stored on centralized servers, posing risks regarding data security and misuse. For a project promising decentralization, centralized data storage represents a fundamental contradiction.

The Verdict: Proceed with Caution

Pi Network’s mainnet launch represents technical progress, but early adopters face a troubling risk-reward calculation.

The evidence suggests Pi Network has successfully built a large user base through highly accessible mobile mining, but fundamental questions persist: centralized node control contradicts decentralization promises, major exchanges remain hesitant to provide listings, privacy concerns abound, and Pi’s treatment of its community showed a level of disconnect with many of the founding principles of cryptocurrency.

Pi Network’s six-year journey to mainnet launch demonstrates enviable user acquisition success and massive deployment of mobile mining tech – but has ultimately delivered a questionable value (and values) proposition. Pi needs to demonstrate to its massive user base that it represents more than just an elaborate data collection exercise. Without meaningful utility expansion, robust privacy protections, and authentic community governance, Pi risks joining the graveyard of projects that confused user acquisition with value creation. The button-tapping phase is over; now comes the hard work of proving whether those taps actually meant something.