Why Self-Custody Matters More Than Ever
2025 has already witnessed some of the largest crypto heists on record:
- Over $2.17 billion stolen from crypto services in the first half of the year, already surpassing 2024’s total (Chainalysis).
- Bybit lost $1.5 billion worth of ETH in February, the biggest exchange hack in history.
- Fake Ledger Live apps circulated among Mac users, tricking them into exposing seed phrases.
- Even physical letter scams resurfaced, targeting hardware wallet owners directly
With attacks growing both online and offline, one truth stands firm: if you don’t hold your keys, you don’t own your crypto. That’s why self-custody with hardware wallets remains the gold standard — keeping private keys offline and transactions physically approved.
In 2025, three brands dominate the conversation: D’CENT, Ledger, and Trezor. Each offers secure self-custody, but with different strengths, weaknesses, and philosophies.
1. D’CENT Wallet: Biometric Security + Real-Time Scam Protection
The D’CENT Wallet, developed by South Korea’s IoTrust, is built around a mobile-first experience with extra layers of security that reflect today’s Web3 risks.
- Biometric Cold Storage
One of the few biometric hardware wallets. Requires both fingerprint + PIN for transactions. Since launch in 2018, D’CENT has had zero successful hacks. - Real-Time Scam Detection
Powered by Blockaid, D’CENT scans outgoing transactions, swaps, dApp connections, and custom tokens for malicious contracts, scam addresses, or phishing attempts. Clear alerts warn you before signing — an industry-first feature missing in most rivals. - Portfolio & Investor Tools
The D’CENT app shows real-time P&L, cost basis, fiat toggles, and portfolio overviews. This makes self-custody not only secure, but practical for both active investors and beginners. - Web3 & NFT Access
With WalletConnect and a built-in dApp browser, D’CENT connects directly to DeFi protocols and supports multiple NFT standards (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, etc.) natively. You can also explore the Web3 airdrop campaign in the app.
Limitations
- Mobile-first only — no native desktop app, which some advanced users may prefer.
- Pricing — the biometric model retails around $139, more than Trezor’s entry devices.
2. Ledger Nano X: The Veteran Industry Standard
Ledger, founded in 2014, remains the best-known brand in hardware wallets, with over 7 million units sold worldwide. The Nano X is its flagship model.
- Security Certifications
Uses a CC EAL5+ Secure Element chip with ANSSI CSPN certification, making it one of the most formally certified devices. - Ledger Live App
Available on desktop and mobile, Ledger Live supports buying crypto with fiat cards or bank transfers, token swaps, and staking. - Cross-Platform Support
Works on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android — convenient for desktop-first users.
Limitations
- PIN-only authentication — lacks biometric options.
- No native Web3 features like WalletConnect or dApp browsing; requires third-party software.
- The Ledger Recover service raised concerns about whether backups weaken self-custody principles.
3. Trezor Safe 3: Open-Source Transparency & Value
Trezor, the original hardware wallet maker, emphasizes open-source transparency and affordability. The Safe 3 (2024) continues this tradition.
- Open-Source Firmware
Fully auditable — trusted by privacy advocates who prefer transparent security over proprietary code. - Broad Coin Support
Trezor supports 9,000+ cryptocurrencies across major blockchains. (Notably, no Solana support.) - Recovery Options
Offers both 12/24-word recovery seeds and optional passphrase protection, giving power users advanced hidden wallet setups. - Affordable Pricing
The Safe 3 starts at $79, making it one of the most budget-friendly reputable wallets.
Limitations
- No biometric authentication — relies only on PIN and optional passphrase.
- No native NFT viewing or strong staking features — requires third-party tools.
- Desktop-first — excellent for PC use, but less convenient on mobile compared to D’CENT.
Feature | D’CENT Wallet | Ledger Nano X | Trezor Safe 3 |
Self-Custody Keys | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Authentication | ✅ Fingerprint + PIN | ✅ PIN only | ✅ PIN only |
Scam Protection | ✅ Real-time alerts (Blockaid) | ✅ Real-time alerts (Blockaid) | ❌ None |
Portfolio Tools | ✅ Advanced (P&L, cost basis, fiat toggle) | ✅ Basic overview | ❌ None |
Desktop App | ❌ Mobile only | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
Price | $139 | $149 | $79 |
Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right Wallet in 2025
All three wallets achieve their core mission: self-custody through cold storage. But they diverge in focus:
- Ledger Nano X: Best for those who want brand reputation, desktop integration, and fiat payment gateways built into the experience.
- Trezor Safe 3: Appeals to privacy advocates and budget users, with open-source transparency and wide coin support at the lowest price point.
- D’CENT Wallet: The most modern approach, offering biometric hardware security, real-time scam detection, and portfolio/NFT tools that make self-custody both safer and easier for everyday investors.
In short:
- Ledger = the veteran with global adoption.
- Trezor = the open-source value play.
D’CENT = the forward-looking wallet for 2025, built for investors who want both offline security and online protection.
Source: https://thenewscrypto.com/hardware-wallets-in-2025-why-dcent-leaves-ledger-and-trezor-behind/