LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – JANUARY 26: Billie Eilish, winner of Record of the Year for “Bad Guy”, … [+]
Recently, the Recording Academy, the organization behind the Grammys, made headlines with its new protocols and guidelines concerning music created by artificial intelligence (AI). While some anticipated that the group would completely ban AI-generated music, the Recording Academy took a different approach, which has proven to be a smart move.
The Recording Academy’s statement on the topic clearly outlines its stance: “Only human creators are eligible to be submitted for consideration for, nominated for, or win a Grammy Award. A work that contains no human authorship is not eligible in any categories.” This straightforward declaration initially led many to believe that AI music was completely excluded from the Grammys, but that’s not actually the case.
The statement continues, “a work that features elements of A.I. material (i.e., material generated by the use of artificial intelligence technology) is eligible in applicable categories.” The Recording Academy went on to provide additional specifications, emphasizing that artists can utilize AI as long as they remain in control of the creative process and seemingly contribute more than the machine.
At first glance, some may question this decision, but in reality, allowing AI music at the Grammys is actually not only a great idea, but one the organization likely couldn’t avoid.
Artificial intelligence has become an integral part of many industries in no time, including music. The rise of AI-generated music is undeniable, and it is here to stay. As technology continues to advance, AI will only become more sophisticated and prevalent in the music creation process. Banning AI music from the Grammys would be a shortsighted decision that ignores the significant impact and potential of this innovative form of artistic expression.
By embracing AI-generated music within its guidelines, the Recording Academy demonstrates its ability to adapt and stay relevant in an ever-evolving music landscape. The group has been called out in the past for not changing fast enough, so addressing this net technology as early as possible might be an attempt to change that reputation.
The music industry is constantly evolving, and new technologies often disrupt traditional norms. The Recording Academy’s decision acknowledges the growing influence of AI and the need to incorporate it into every aspect of the music industry. This move showcases the Recording Academy’s willingness to embrace change and recognize the contributions of artists who leverage AI in their creative process, though it still insists on human creativity being front and center.
The Grammys have long been regarded as a reflection of the music industry currently. The awards are supposed to honor what’s happening now, and in this moment, that’s at least partially AI. As AI-generated music gains popularity and recognition, it would be remiss for the Grammys to ignore its impact. Many current successful songs and albums incorporate elements of AI technology, and there will be many, many more that do so in the near future.
By allowing AI music to be considered in applicable categories, the Grammys ensure that they continue to reward and celebrate the most deserving and popular works, even if they are influenced by AI. If the organization was to immediately discount any track or album that used some AI tech, all of a sudden many of the top titles would no longer be in the running, and then the Recording Academy would wind up honoring music no one knows—which is itself another issue, one the group is already dealing with in some regards.
Ultimately, AI is unavoidable. It’s out in the world and people are using it daily for a multitude of reasons. Some organizations are embracing it, while others are shunning it and doing their best to keep it at arm’s length (think the WGA in its strike against content platforms like Netflix
NFLX
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2023/06/22/the-grammys-didnt-outright-ban-ai-music-heres-why-that-was-a-smart-move/