- Hashed’s crypto wallet shows the company still has approximately 25 million LUNA, which could have brought in about $3 billion if sold at the coin’s all-time high of $118 in early April.
- The commentators estimated LUNA will be valued at $143 by the end of 2022 before climbing to $390 by 2025, according to the survey. Dr. Dimitrios Salampasis.
- A user saw in the terms and conditions that the corporation is not liable for damages caused by the exchange rate. According to on-chain data, the South Korean venture firm Hashed has lost $2.9 billion on its Terra (LUNA) assets.
Stablegains sues, Hashed loses billions, Finder is incorrect, and more….: The fallout from the Terra ecosystem’s demise is still being felt, with Stablegains, a yield generation software based in the United States, facing legal action over its losses.
Hashed Suffers A Significant Setback
Based on a post on a Terra forum by co-founder Kamil Ruszkowski requesting for relief financing, users believe Stablegain has allegedly lost up to $44 million in deposited assets. He said that just one day before TerraUSD (UST) lost its peg to the US currency, its users’ balances amounted to over 47.6 million UST from 4,878 deposits. According to CoinGecko, the price of UST is currently $0.075 per coin.
Erickson Kramer Osbourne (EKO), a class action law firm, sent Stablegains a letter on May 14 demanding a record of customer accounts, marketing materials, and any interactions involving UST. According to the letter, you have an uncompromising duty to preserve any material you know or reasonably should know will be relevant evidence in an ongoing case, and failure to comply…may bring about common or criminal results.
EKO confirmed the legitimacy of the letters to Cointelegraph and stated it had launched an inquiry into the Terra ecosystem collapse in preparation for a potential class action lawsuit. On deposited US dollars, Stablegains members may earn up to 15% annual percentage yield (APY), which the corporation supposedly changed to UST to earn a yield on the Anchor Protocol.
ALSO READ – Argo Blockchain Reports 1.6 million Pounds In Net Income: 90% Drop Since Last Year
USDC and UST are the main stablecoins, according to documentation from Stablegains’ website, which was updated seven days ago. Anchor is our current go-to procedure and the basis for the Stablegains stable 15 percent Plus APY rate, the site says.
Stablegains indicated it spreads funds among a variety of stablecoins to not be entirely exposed to the possible instability of one stablecoin, according to cached results of the webpage, but customers claim the company has since changed the wording on how it mitigates risks.
Withdrawals have started to be acknowledged by Stablegains, despite the fact that USDC may be given at the ongoing business sector worth of UST. A user saw in the terms and conditions that the corporation is not liable for damages caused by the exchange rate.
According to on-chain data, the South Korean venture firm Hashed has lost $2.9 billion on its Terra (LUNA) assets.
Finder Survey Is 92 Percent Incorrect
Hashed’s crypto wallet shows the company still has approximately 25 million LUNA, which could have brought in about $3 billion if sold at the coin’s all-time high of $118 in early April. According to reports, Hashed claims to be financially solid and unaffected by the Luna price drop. Finder, a comparison website, conducted a survey of 36 fintech specialists in late March, and the results were bullish on the price of LUNA.
The commentators estimated LUNA will be valued at $143 by the end of 2022 before climbing to $390 by 2025, according to the survey. Dr. Dimitrios Salampasis, a financial lecturer at Victoria’s Swinburne University of Technology, was one of only three experts (8.3%) who doubted Terra, saying algorithmic stablecoins are inherently fragile and not stable at all, and that LUNA will be existing in a state of perpetual vulnerability. Dr. Salampasis did an excellent job.
Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2022/05/20/stablegains-files-a-lawsuit-hashed-loses-billions-finder-is-incorrect-and-much-more/