Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit: The Real Reason The Lawsuit Still Continues

The lawsuit between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) remains unresolved, despite similar cases experiencing pauses.

Notably, the SEC has prioritized cases with urgent deadlines, which may explain the lack of a pause request. Ripple’s next court deadline is April 16, 2025, leaving both parties with ample time before making any further decisions.

Ripple Lawsuit Continues as SEC Shifts Focus

Legal experts believe the SEC handles cases with fast-approaching court deadlines to avoid proceeding with the Ripple matter. The Commission recently sought extra time for its Coinbase case, but this shows a change in focus.

The pending deadline for Ripple is weeks away, so the commission shows no immediate need for any suspension request.

Both the SEC and Binance entered into a 60-day agreement to discuss a potential settlement. Coinbase accomplished the same outcome by securing more time for its interlocutory appeal response, which indicates that the SEC modifies its strategies depending on deadline restrictions.

Meanwhile, the lawsuit against Ripple continues without interruption because the company has refused to seek any case delay.

– Advertisement –

Fox journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that the SEC leadership members watched upcoming political changes. The Trump administration‘s confirmation of Paul Atkins as SEC Chair could alter the agency’s legal approach. Ripple’s current litigation position could change if Paul Atkins receives confirmation as SEC Chair.

Former SEC Lawyer Predicts Ripple Case End

Since enforcement priorities have changed, former SEC lawyer John Reed Stark predicts the lawsuit will end soon.

According to his evaluation, the SEC’s handling of cryptocurrency cases shows signs of diminishing authority, which could result in withdrawn cases.

The Commission has shown a pattern of postponing deadlines in different lawsuits, indicating a changing enforcement direction.

According to Stark, the momentum behind SEC cryptocurrency-related investigations has decreased, and this decline affects current legal proceedings.

His proposal involved the agency pulling out from all appeals, including Ripple’s, while deciding not to undertake more extensive court procedures.

The present regulatory landscape is evolving, and this change might influence how this particular lawsuit concludes.

Ripple encountered legal difficulties after the SEC launched its security registration complaint against the company in 2020.

Professional stakeholders and financial investors have paid attention to this notable case. When the SEC changes its appeals direction, Ripple may achieve freedom from the lawsuit.

Trump Administration Supports Crypto-Friendly Policies

The Biden administration’s financial regulators actively targeted crypto firms by bringing numerous legal cases against them.

Various companies have faced more than 100 legal actions from the joint forces of the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The regulatory environment now exists due to these lawsuits affecting significant platforms such as Kraken and Coinbase.

The current administration, led by Trump, shows support for cryptocurrency by aiming to establish more favorable regulatory conditions.

President Trump chose Paul Atkins to become the new SEC chairman so that regulatory oversight could possibly be reduced.

Under this government’s incoming policies, digitally focused legislative changes are anticipated to affect how authorities manage virtual assets.

Kraken restarted US client staking services as part of the regulatory changes observed in the market. The exchange withdrew its services because of SEC actions until Trump won the election and resumed operations.

The ongoing revisions to regulatory policies might allow more crypto enterprises to obtain operational freedom in the US market.

Ripple’s court case can create legal precedents that federal regulators will follow in upcoming decisions.

Future actions by the SEC will rely on leadership changes and wide-ranging policy adjustments. All attention remains fixed on what will unfold next during the lawsuit before April 16.