WhatsApp has officially been pulled into the European Union’s strictest internet crackdown. On Monday, the European Commission gave Meta’s popular messaging app a new status under the Digital Services Act.
WhatsApp open channels now count as a Very Large Online Platform, which means Meta must now meet high legal standards for how it handles content, transparency, and user risks.
This applies only to WhatsApp channels, not to the regular one-on-one chats. The law does not affect private messages.
These new channels are used by celebrities, public figures, and news outlets to broadcast updates, and now, they come with legal obligations.
EU adds WhatsApp after sexual deepfake scandal on X
The announcement came just hours after EU regulators launched a case against Elon Musk’s X. They’re investigating the spread of sexually explicit deepfake images created by Grok, the AI bot running on X.
That platform, which was fined €120 million in December, is already under the DSA. The White House said the law is being used to punish U.S. companies unfairly.
The U.S. government is not happy. Last year, after the EU fine on X, the Trump administration blocked travel access for Thierry Breton, one of the officials who helped build the law. That came after Washington accused the EU of turning internet rules into a censorship tool.
WhatsApp became a DSA target because of its numbers. Meta had already reported that the platform averaged about 46.8 million monthly users on its channels during the second half of 2024. That crossed the threshold needed for the Commission to step in.
These rules are not suggestions. Once labeled, platforms like WhatsApp must publish user stats every six months and assess how their channels are used to spread illegal or harmful content. If they break the law, they could be fined up to 6% of their annual global sales. For a company like Meta, that’s a huge financial hit.
Bloomberg first reported Meta had been told this was coming. But now it’s official, and WhatsApp is the latest to join Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X in the EU’s strict list.
EU lawmakers demand new digital agency to keep control
Alexandra Geese, a member of the European Parliament from Germany, said none of this is about pressure from the United States. “The enforcement is not happening because there’s too much pressure from the Trump administration,” Geese said. She worked directly on the DSA and warned early on that the EU needed an independent agency to enforce these laws.
“This is an ‘I told you so’ moment,” Geese added. And she wasn’t the only one. Last year, Portugal pushed for the EU to create a single digital enforcement agency.
Gonçalo Matias, Portugal’s minister for state reform, invited 13 countries to a summit in October to talk about it. He said countries need to “coordinate responsibilities currently spread across multiple authorities.”
In the final statement from that meeting, the 13 countries said a single regulator “can consolidate responsibilities, ensure coherent enforcement of EU digital legislation and foster an innovation-friendly regulatory culture.”
But not everyone supported the idea. Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland opposed it. These countries don’t like giving Brussels more power.
Mario Mariniello from Bruegel, a think tank, argued that this kind of enforcement shouldn’t stay inside the European Commission. “There, the level of politicization is so high that you would have a significant benefit,” he wrote last September. He said a separate agency would stop political interference, especially when outside countries like the U.S. get involved.
He pointed to the EU’s delay in fining Google as an example. Trade talks with Washington were tense, and the EU’s trade chief held back the fine. The fine came later, but the delay showed the Commission was vulnerable to pressure.
Geese said this shows why the Commission can’t keep doing everything itself. “It’s so political, there’s no real enforcement, there’s no independent enforcement, independent from politics,” she said.
But she also admitted that trying to build a new agency now might be a bad idea. “You’re gonna debate this for two or three years, with the Council, and Hungary and Slovakia are going to say: No way. And in the meantime, nothing happens, because that becomes the excuse: The agency is going to do it,” she said.
Geese said time matters. Europe is under pressure to respond to the Grok case, where an AI bot published sexual deepfakes online. She said it’s “one of the most egregious episodes of a large language model perpetuating gender based violence.”
If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.
Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/metas-whatsapp-tough-eu-content-regime/