Web2 refers to the second generation of the internet, where websites and web applications are centralized. Web2 has been the norm for many years and is characterized by a client-server architecture, with data stored on central servers controlled by a few large corporations. This centralized approach has limitations in terms of privacy, security, and control over data. Web3, on the other hand, is a decentralized version of the internet, where data is distributed and controlled by the users themselves, using blockchain technology. This allows for greater transparency, security, and control over personal data.
Understanding the technical differences between Web2 and Web3 is crucial for developers to adapt and create applications for the future of the internet. In this article, we will explore the technical differences between Web2 and Web3 and the future implications
Protocol
In Web 2.0, computers use HTTP in the form of unique web addresses to find information, which is stored at a fixed location, generally on a single server. With Web 3.0, because the information would be found based on its content, it could be stored in multiple locations simultaneously and hence be decentralized.
HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) is the primary protocol used for transmitting data over the internet. It is a client-server protocol that allows for communication between web servers and web clients, such as web browsers. On the other hand, IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) is a distributed protocol that provides a decentralized file storage system. It is designed to create a more efficient and secure way to store and share files over the internet.
One advantage of HTTP is its widespread use and compatibility with all web browsers, making it easy to access websites and web applications. However, HTTP has limitations in terms of scalability and security. IPFS, on the other hand, offers a more secure and efficient way of storing and sharing files through its decentralized architecture. It allows for faster access to data and reduces the risk of data loss or corruption. However, IPFS is still in its early stages and its adoption is not as widespread as HTTP.
Architecture
Centralized architecture refers to a system where a single entity has control over all the data and resources, while decentralized architecture is a system where multiple nodes share the data and resources, with no single entity controlling them. Decentralized architecture provides benefits such as increased security, transparency, and resilience, while centralized architecture offers better control and efficiency.
Blockchain is a type of distributed ledger technology that uses a peer-to-peer network to record and verify transactions. In a blockchain network, each participant has a copy of the ledger, and transactions are verified by a consensus mechanism that involves multiple nodes. The decentralized nature of the network makes it difficult to tamper with the ledger, as any changes would need to be approved by the majority of nodes. This makes blockchain a secure and transparent way to record and transfer data, and has led to its adoption in various industries.
Data Sharing
In Web2, traditional client-server data sharing is the primary method, where a central server stores and manages data while client devices request and receive data from the server. The server is responsible for handling all data transactions, and clients must be connected to the server to access and interact with the data. This model can result in issues with scalability, security, and performance, as all traffic is funneled through a single point of access.
In contrast, Web3 uses decentralized data sharing through peer-to-peer networks rather than centralized servers, allowing for more secure, transparent, and efficient sharing of data. Unlike traditional client-server data sharing, decentralized data sharing uses blockchain technology to ensure the immutability and integrity of data, and it eliminates the need for intermediaries, reducing the risk of data breaches and manipulation.
Web3’s decentralized data sharing also promotes data ownership and control, enabling individuals to share and monetize their data on their own terms. Web3 data-sharing protocols are designed to be distributed across multiple nodes, allowing for greater resilience, scalability, and security. This decentralized network structure is made possible through the use of blockchain technology and other peer-to-peer protocols, which allow for secure and transparent data sharing without the need for a central authority.
One of the most notable protocols for data sharing in Web3 is InterPlanetary File System (IPFS), a distributed protocol that provides a decentralized file storage system. IPFS is designed to create a more efficient and secure way to store and share files over the internet. It uses content-addressing instead of traditional location-based addressing, making it more secure and efficient than traditional methods.
Another protocol used in Web3 is the Ethereum network’s Whisper protocol, which allows for peer-to-peer messaging between nodes in the Ethereum network. Whisper is designed to be secure, efficient, and scalable, and it provides a decentralized alternative to traditional messaging services.
In addition to these protocols, there are also various decentralized data-sharing platforms and applications being developed in Web3, such as Ocean Protocol and Golem, which allow for the secure and efficient sharing of data and computing resources.
Data Storage
Web2 and Web3 differ in the way they handle data storage. In Web2, data is typically stored in centralized servers controlled by large corporations, while in Web3, data is decentralized and distributed across a network of nodes, allowing for greater security, privacy, and accessibility.
Web2 Storage
In Web2, data is typically stored in centralized databases or file systems. Some examples of Web2 storage technologies include:
SQL databases
Structured Query Language (SQL) databases are a type of relational database that store data in tables with columns and rows. They are commonly used in Web2 applications for storing structured data such as user profiles, transaction records, and inventory data.
NoSQL databases
NoSQL databases are a type of non-relational database that store data in a more flexible format, such as key-value pairs, documents, or graphs. They are commonly used in Web2 applications for storing unstructured data such as social media posts, product reviews, and sensor data.
File systems
File systems are used to store unstructured data such as images, videos, and documents. Web2 file systems typically rely on a centralized server or storage area network (SAN) to manage file storage and access.
While Web2 storage technologies have been successful in enabling data storage and retrieval, they also have limitations in terms of security, privacy, and accessibility. Centralized storage systems are vulnerable to data breaches, censorship, and downtime, and they require a high level of trust in the central authority managing the data.
Web3 Storage
Web3 storage solutions aim to address the limitations of centralized storage systems by leveraging decentralized and distributed storage architectures. Web3 storage solutions offer greater security, privacy, and accessibility by using cryptographic protocols, peer-to-peer networks, and blockchain technology to store and manage data.
Here are some examples of Web3 storage solutions:
IPFS (InterPlanetary File System)
IPFS is a decentralized file storage system that allows users to store and share files across a network of nodes. IPFS uses content-addressing instead of location-based addressing, which allows for more efficient and secure storage and retrieval of files.
Swarm
Swarm is a decentralized storage platform that is part of the Ethereum ecosystem. It allows users to store and retrieve data on a peer-to-peer network of nodes, with the added benefit of being able to use smart contracts to manage and access data.
Filecoin
Filecoin is a decentralized storage network that uses blockchain technology to incentivize users to contribute storage space and bandwidth to the network. Users can earn tokens by providing storage space to the network and can use tokens to access storage services provided by other users.
Arweave
Arweave is a blockchain-based storage network that uses a novel consensus algorithm called “Proof of Access” to ensure that data is stored permanently on the network. Arweave aims to create a new model of storage that is both decentralized and sustainable.
These are just a few examples of Web3 storage solutions that are currently available. As the Web3 ecosystem continues to evolve, we can expect to see more innovative and decentralized storage solutions emerge.
Network
Web2 networks are typically centralized and rely on a single point of control, whereas web3 networks are decentralized and rely on a peer-to-peer network structure. In web2, data and services are primarily hosted on central servers owned by a few large corporations. In contrast, web3 networks are designed to be distributed across multiple nodes, allowing for greater resilience, scalability, and security. This decentralized network structure is made possible through the use of blockchain technology and other peer-to-peer protocols, which allow for secure and transparent data sharing without the need for a central authority.
Security
Web2 and Web3 differ significantly in terms of security. Web2, being a centralized system, is vulnerable to several security risks, such as data breaches, identity theft, and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. In contrast, Web3’s decentralized architecture and encrypted approach ensure higher security and resilience by distributing data across the network, making it difficult for attackers to manipulate or destroy data.
Web2 security protocols rely heavily on SSL/TLS encryption to secure data transmission over the internet. However, SSL/TLS encryption alone is not enough to ensure complete security, as the centralized nature of Web2 networks makes them vulnerable to single points of failure and attacks. As a result, Web2 systems are often vulnerable to security breaches and data theft.
In contrast, Web3 heavily relies on cryptographic techniques to ensure security and privacy. These include hash functions, public-key cryptography, digital signatures, and secure multi-party computation. Hash functions are used to convert data of any size into a fixed-length string of characters, which can be used to verify the integrity of data. Public-key cryptography is used for secure communication between parties, and digital signatures are used to verify the authenticity of data. Secure multi-party computation allows for the computation of data without revealing the actual data to any of the parties involved.
Web Applications
In traditional web application architecture, the client sends a request to the server, which processes it and sends a response back to the client. The server-side logic manages data and business logic while the client-side logic focuses on user interface and rendering. This model is commonly known as the client-server model and is centralized in nature.
In Web3, decentralized web applications (dApps) are built on the blockchain and allow for the creation of trustless, transparent, and secure applications that operate with no intermediaries. Smart contracts are self-executing contracts that automatically enforce the rules and regulations of an agreement. They play a critical role in the operation of dApps by enabling the creation of decentralized, stand-alone systems that operate without centralized control. Smart contracts enable the creation of new business models, facilitate secure and efficient transactions, and provide openness and accountability in dApp ecosystems.
Conclusion
The differences between Web2 and Web3 are significant, with Web3 representing a paradigm shift in terms of its technical architecture, protocols, data sharing, storage, network structure, security, and application development. The move towards decentralized and peer-to-peer networks, as well as the use of cryptographic techniques and smart contracts, offers new opportunities for data privacy, security, and ownership. While Web3 is still in its early stages of development, it has the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with the internet and each other, providing a more open, transparent, and secure digital environment.
Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/technical-differences-between-web3-and-web2/