The Economist Magazine Criticized the Crypto Industry Harshly! Here’s Why

The Economist has taken scathing criticism of the cryptocurrency sector, describing it as the “ultimate swamp asset” and accusing it of straying from the ideals of decentralization, particularly in the context of US politics.

The Economist Denounces Cryptocurrency as the “Ultimate Swamp Asset,” Criticizes US Industry’s Turn to Political Rent-Seeking

The paper argues that the crypto sector, once hailed as a revolutionary tool for financial freedom and technological innovation, has become a tool for political rent-seeking and insider enrichment, particularly under the influence of President Donald Trump and his allies.

“Instead of disrupting power structures, crypto in America has been absorbed by them,” the article states. “It’s no longer about decentralization. It’s about cronyism, lobbying, and influence.”

The publication claims that key players in the US crypto ecosystem have aligned themselves with the political establishment to gain regulatory favoritism and financial leverage. According to The Economist, this shift has undermined the movement’s core principle of trustless, permissionless systems designed to empower users rather than institutions.

While the article acknowledged that blockchain technology still has potential, it accused the current U.S. crypto industry of prioritizing profit over principle and political influence over innovation.

The increasing campaign contributions, direct lobbying and positive policy pressures linked to figures close to Trump’s inner circle have been cited as evidence that the industry has become a “swamp asset” — a term traditionally used to describe murky, high-risk and politically complicated financial instruments.

“Crypto has become the very thing it once swore to destroy,” the paper said, warning that unless the sector refocuses on transparency and decentralization, it risks becoming just another entrenched corner of the financial elite it once opposed.

*This is not investment advice.