Poland’s parliament failed on Friday, 5 December to overturn President Karol Nawrocki’s veto of a bill that would have tightened oversight of the country’s cryptocurrency market.
The result halts Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s attempt to introduce stricter supervision, despite his warning that hostile intelligence networks increasingly exploit digital assets.
According to a Reuters report, Tusk told lawmakers the crypto sector presents a growing national-security challenge and argued that the state needs stronger tools to police it.
He framed the vote as a choice between allowing foreign interference to flourish or equipping regulators to act. The bill required a three-fifths majority to pass; it fell short after right-wing parties and the presidency rejected what they viewed as excessive restrictions.
Source: X
The proposal would have aligned Poland more closely with the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation [MiCA].
It sought to give the national financial regulator direct authority over crypto-asset service providers and introduce criminal penalties for issuing tokens or offering services without a licence.
Opponents argued the framework went far beyond what other member states adopted and risked pushing Poland’s crypto businesses offshore.
Polish security agencies have previously accused Moscow of using digital assets to fund sabotage operations — allegations Russia denies.
Italy pushes deeper into oversight as Poland stalls
Poland’s decision comes just a day after Italy launched an “in-depth” review of investor safeguards around cryptocurrency markets.
Italian authorities stated that the rising exposure to retail investors and cross-border risks warranted a closer examination of how crypto platforms operate.
The contrast highlights a widening divide inside Europe: several EU economies are accelerating their MiCA alignment, while Poland now finds itself stepping back from regulatory enforcement.
Global context: The U.S. shifts toward clarity, not restriction
Poland’s stalled legislation also diverges from developments in the United States, where lawmakers have begun passing measures that provide clearer rules for the digital-asset industry.
Recent U.S. actions, including the passage of the GENIUS Act and the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, signal a shift in political approach toward regulating crypto through transparency rather than imposing heavy compliance burdens.
While American agencies continue to monitor national-security risks tied to digital assets, the U.S. approach increasingly aims to formalise the market.
That stands in contrast to Poland, where political deadlock has left the sector without a clear regulatory path.
What comes next
The presidency has called on the government to draft a new bill that both sides can support.
Until then, Poland remains out of sync with Europe’s broader regulatory direction, leaving crypto firms uncertain about future supervision — and giving neighbouring countries a clearer lead in shaping how digital-asset markets operate.
Final Thoughts
- Poland’s veto outcome leaves its crypto sector without a clear supervisory path at a time when Europe is moving toward tighter, MiCA-aligned standards.
- The split underscores a broader global divergence: some jurisdictions tighten controls for security, while others, like the U.S., prioritise regulatory clarity to support innovation.