TLDR
- Coinbase filed lawsuits Thursday against Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut challenging state regulation of prediction markets
- The exchange argues federal CFTC holds exclusive jurisdiction over prediction markets, not state gambling authorities
- Legal action follows Coinbase’s announcement to enter prediction markets through partnership with Kalshi
- Robinhood, Kalshi, and Crypto.com already face similar state-level legal challenges over prediction market offerings
- Supreme Court may resolve the federal versus state jurisdiction conflict in 2026
Coinbase launched legal action Thursday against three states. The crypto exchange filed suits in Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut.
The lawsuits challenge state attempts to regulate prediction markets. Coinbase seeks court protection before facing potential enforcement actions.
Coinbase Global, Inc., COIN
The company announced its prediction market entry Wednesday. The timing suggests a proactive legal strategy.
“These states have taken or threatened action against other prediction market players in an attempt to gain jurisdiction over something they have no legal right to regulate,” Coinbase stated Thursday. The company expects similar regulatory pressure.
Federal Versus State Control
The dispute centers on regulatory authority. States and casino interests want gambling laws to govern prediction markets.
Prediction market operators argue for CFTC oversight. They claim federal law already establishes this jurisdiction.
Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal defended the approach. “We’re just asking the courts to confirm what Congress has already done,” he said.
The company will request court orders blocking state interference. These orders would affirm CFTC’s exclusive authority over prediction markets.
Courts have issued conflicting rulings on the matter. The legal uncertainty affects every company in this sector.
Bloomberg Intelligence analysts expect Supreme Court involvement. A high court ruling could come in 2026.
Prediction Market Boom Draws Scrutiny
Prediction markets grew rapidly over the past year. Users bet on elections, sports, and various event outcomes.
Coinbase partnered with Kalshi for its market entry. The non-exclusive integration gives users access to prediction trading.
Kalshi has fought regulatory battles in multiple states. Robinhood Markets entered the space and faced similar challenges.
Crypto.com also launched prediction market services. All three companies dealt with state-level litigation.
State agencies want local regulatory control. This approach would require companies to comply with 50 different frameworks.
Federal oversight would create uniform national rules. The CFTC already regulates commodity futures and derivatives.
Diversification Strategy
Coinbase operates the largest US crypto exchange. The prediction market move expands beyond traditional crypto trading.
The company chose a partnership model with Kalshi. This limits direct operational risk while testing market demand.
Other exchanges moved faster into prediction markets. Coinbase’s delayed entry came with legal preparation.
The lawsuits seek to establish clear operating rules. Success would protect the company from state enforcement actions.
Coinbase argues Congress granted CFTC authority over these markets. The company wants judicial confirmation of this existing framework.
The three targeted states represent key markets. Michigan, Illinois, and Connecticut have active regulatory enforcement.
Coinbase filed suits before launching its prediction market service. This strategy differs from competitors who faced reactive enforcement.
The post Coinbase (COIN) Stock: Exchange Sues Michigan, Illinois, Connecticut Over Prediction Market Rules appeared first on Blockonomi.