Ripple lawsuit survival is not the same as industry-grade neutrality; SWIFT’s CIO argues banks prefer shared governance and enforceability over a vendor-tied ledger. Meanwhile, Bitcoin faces fragile support at $104,000 and XRP sees a surge in payment volume that signals renewed on‑chain utility.
SWIFT vs Ripple: banks prefer neutral, jointly governed rails over company-tied ledgers.
Bitcoin’s key technical support sits at the 200‑day EMA near $104,000; a break risks deeper declines.
XRP posted a 100% jump in daily payment volume on Sept. 1, 2025, exceeding 2.15 billion tokens moved.
Ripple lawsuit: SWIFT criticizes legal survival; Bitcoin risks the $104,000 zone; XRP payment volume spikes 100% — read analysis and next steps.
What is the Ripple lawsuit debate?
Ripple lawsuit coverage centers on whether legal survival translates into the type of neutrality banks require. SWIFT’s innovation chief said surviving a court case does not equal the shared, enforceable governance banks need for core infrastructure.
How does SWIFT justify preferring shared governance over Ripple’s model?
SWIFT positions itself as a cooperative of thousands of banks that jointly set rules, creating enforceability and privacy controls that public blockchains currently lack. Tom Zschach emphasized that banks value neutral, collectively governed rails over networks tied to a single corporate entity.
‘,
‘
🚀 Advanced Trading Tools Await You!
Maximize your potential. Join now and start trading!
‘,
‘
📈 Professional Trading Platform
Leverage advanced tools and a wide range of coins to boost your investments. Sign up now!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-bitget”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBitget”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBitget.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBitget[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBitget.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBitget”, sessperindex);
}
})();
Bitcoin $104,000 is the current focal point because the 200‑day EMA sits near that level and represents the last major technical cushion after the $120,000 and $109,000 breakdowns.
If the $104,000 zone fails, chart structure implies limited immediate support below, raising the probability of a prolonged decline rather than a quick rebound. Analysts note that thin support, persistent selling volume, and weak momentum create conditions where even modest pressure can accelerate losses.
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-binance”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBinance”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBinance.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBinance[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBinance.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBinance”, sessperindex);
}
})();