VanEck Reveals Budget Neutral Ways for US to Expand Its Bitcoin Reserve

VanEck has outlined several potential budget-neutral strategies that could enable the United States to expand its Bitcoin reserve without using taxpayer funds. The analysis, shared by Matthew Sigel, explores financial mechanisms that leverage existing assets, modify regulatory policies, and introduce new debt instruments.

VanEck Suggests Gold Revaluation and Bonds to Boost US Bitcoin Reserve

After President Trump’s executive order to create a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, Matthew Sigel shared insights on X. He outlined ways the U.S. government could expand its Bitcoin holdings without impacting the federal budget. One key strategy involves revaluing gold reserves, which would require congressional approval but could generate substantial financial resources. By adjusting the official valuation of gold, the government could unlock additional capital to acquire more Bitcoin.

Another option involves issuing Bitcoin-backed bonds. Under this plan, the U.S. Treasury could sell bonds priced above face value and allocate a portion of the proceeds toward purchasing Bitcoin. This approach would not impose new taxpayer costs, as Bitcoin would serve as collateral. The Treasury could repay bondholders with either Bitcoin or U.S. dollars upon maturity. This method could appeal to institutional investors while incorporating Bitcoin into government debt instruments.

Meanwhile, the OCC has cleared the way for Federal Banks to engage in cryptocurrency activities, including stablecoin transactions and custody services. The new guidance also allows banks to participate in DeFi activities like node validation without requiring prior licensing. This move signals a significant shift in crypto regulation under the Trump administration.

Utilizing the Federal Reserve and IMF for Expansion

VanEck also suggested modifying the Federal Reserve’s surplus policies to facilitate Bitcoin acquisitions. Before 2015, the Federal Reserve maintained larger surplus funds, but legislative changes limited these reserves. By adjusting surplus regulations, the Fed could allocate excess funds toward expanding the Bitcoin Reserve. However, such a move would require congressional approval.

Another proposal involves lobbying the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to include Bitcoin in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). SDRs are international reserve assets used to supplement official reserves of IMF member countries.

If Bitcoin were added to this system, it could further cement its role as a global financial asset. While this approach may not require direct congressional approval, it would necessitate diplomatic negotiations and policy shifts within the IMF.

Selling Government Assets to Support Reserve Growth

Beyond traditional financial strategies, VanEck proposed selling surplus government assets as a way to fund Bitcoin purchases. One unconventional suggestion is the sale of 1.4 billion pounds of government-stored cheese, estimated to be worth between $2 billion and $4 billion. 

Although the cheese stockpile is privately held, the USDA has the authority to sell excess dairy products without congressional approval. This approach could provide a direct funding source for Bitcoin purchases without affecting the federal budget.

Additionally, the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), a self-funded government entity, could be another mechanism for acquiring Bitcoin. The ESF has been used in the past to manage foreign exchange reserves and stabilize currency markets. Since it operates outside congressional appropriations, it could expand Bitcoin holdings without requiring new legislation.

Bitcoin Reserve Expansion Likely to Face Policy Challenges

While VanEck has presented multiple budget-neutral options, many of these strategies would require policy adjustments and regulatory approvals. Some proposals, such as gold revaluation and Federal Reserve surplus modifications, would need congressional approval. 

The U.S. government’s approach to Bitcoin continues to evolve, with the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve marking a major step toward integrating digital assets.

More so, Crypto Czar David Sacks recently revealed that the U.S. government lost over $17 billion by selling nearly 195,000 BTC over the past decade. He criticized previous administrations for lacking a long-term Bitcoin strategy, arguing that holding the assets could have significantly benefited taxpayers.

Additionally, President Donald Trump highlighted the importance of stablecoin legislation during the crypto summit, aiming to establish clear regulations before Congress’ summer recess. He emphasized that regulatory clarity would drive innovation and growth in the financial sector.

✓ Share:

Ronny Mugendi

Ronny Mugendi is a seasoned crypto journalist with four years of professional experience, having contributed significantly to various media outlets on cryptocurrency trends and technologies. With over 4000 published articles across various media outlets, he aims to inform, educate and introduce more people to the Blockchain and DeFi world. Outside of his journalism career, Ronny enjoys the thrill of bike riding, exploring new trails and landscapes.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.