California’s proposed billionaire wealth tax faces crypto backlash, raising concerns over capital flight, innovation risks, and funding healthcare amid fiscal uncertainty.
California has proposed a new wealth tax targeting billionaires, prompting strong criticism from crypto industry leaders statewide. Nevertheless, advocates claim that the plan would stabilize the financing of healthcare in the face of the growing fiscal strains. Critics, in the meantime, are warning that the proposal will lead to capital flight and a lack of innovation in the various technology sectors.
California Billionaire Wealth Tax Proposal Sparks Industry Debate
The proposal presents a 5% tax on the residents whose net assets are over one billion dollars. Notably, the tax applies in part to unrealized gains, extending its application to the traditional measures of income. As such, there is a possibility that some of the affected persons will have to sell assets to clear their payment bills.
I say this with no joy as a California resident:
Many who’ve made this state great are quietly discussing leaving or have decided to leave in the next 12 months.
More generally, one of the fascinating developments of this decade is people voting their views not with the… https://t.co/bTlBnsYdnY
— Hunter Horsley (@HHorsley) December 27, 2025
Based on the initiative documents, an estimated two hundred California residents and trusts would be subject to tax. Additionally, the taxable properties are also global stocks, business resources of the privately owned business, and intellectual property. But real estate property and retirement plans are still not covered by the present system.
Related Reading: Crypto Tax News: Lawmakers Push IRS: Major Crypto Tax Shake-Up| Live Bitcoin News
Proponents say the plan will supply much-needed financial support for state-wide public services. In particular, the proponents of the law refer to a possible cut of thirty billion dollars in federal Medicaid subsidies a year. Therefore, the introduction of alternative sources of revenue is considered the key to the stability of healthcare.
It has been supported by the SEIU United Healthcare Workers West union publicly. The union also focuses on protecting those who are vulnerable populations who rely on state-funded medical programs. In this way, those advocating the tax market it as a social responsibility and not a punishment.
A foundational assumption behind the wealth tax is that while financial capital may be mobile, human capital historically has not been therefore the cost can be structurally bourne
I would start questioning that assumption heavily going forward with the rise of AI agents
— Jeff Park (@dgt10011) December 28, 2025
The proposal would make payments due to qualifying taxpayers starting in 2027. Significantly, people were able to select a lump payment or disperse the payments within five years. However, installment plans would be subject to interest, which adds up to higher payment requirements.
Crypto Leaders Warn of Capital Flight and Economic Risks
The executives of the crypto industry have reacted fiercely against the structure and implications of the proposal. Hunter Horsley, the CEO of Bitwise, condemned taxation of unrealized gains as inefficient. Likewise, Nic Carter, the founder of Castle Island Ventures, had advised of unfavorable long-term implications.
The move has been critiqued, especially by Kraken co-founder Jesse Powell. Powell, in a post on X, has expressed that the tax will drive out billionaires in California. As a consequence, he advised that expenditure, charity, and jobs would go with them.
The critics always point out the issue of liquidity due to taxation of net worth rather than income. As an illustration, founders who own shares in a company in private form do not have adequate liquid cash. This would consequently affect business and operational planning as a result of forced asset sales.
Representative Ro Khanna has become the leading defender of the proposal in public. The California Democrat claims that it would boost childcare, housing, and education services. Based on this, he thinks that such investments enhance long-term innovation in the country.
The plans of revenue allocation have provided 90% financing of healthcare services in California. In the meantime, one out of ten would facilitate educational programs and food assistance programs. According to its proponents, this distribution is a combination of short-term social demands and long-term economic objectives.
Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/crypto-industry-slams-californias-proposed-tax-on-unrealized-gains/