Imagine what you could do with a 19% dividend.
To be clear, any dividend that high simply isn’t sustainable. So if you do see one, I don’t recommend buying.
Still, the thought’s nice. With a 19% yield, financial independence becomes easy. Want to live on $60,000 per year? Well, conventional wisdom says you’ll need at least $1.5 million to generate that kind of income, and some advisors will tell you to save $2 million, just to be safe.
But a 19% dividend? Suddenly it only takes $316,000 in savings to secure $60,000 in yearly income. That cuts down how long one needs to work and save by decades. Who wouldn’t want such a thing?
And while a 19% yield may be off the table (for reasons I’ll get into in a moment), all is not lost here: thanks to the 2022 pullback, there are plenty of safe dividends in closed-end funds (CEFs) in the 10% to 12% range, which is still plenty high to build a livable income stream on a reasonable nest egg. I have plenty of buys in that neighborhood that I’ve personally safety checked in the portfolio of my CEF Insider service.
But just for interest’s sake, let’s look at one 19% dividend (18.6%, to be precise) out there—the payout on a CEF called the Cornerstone Total Return Fund (CRF)—to illustrate why a payout that high is one to avoid.
First off, it’s easy to understand why you might be tempted by CRF’s 18.6% yield, given its long history: the fund has been around since 1986.
What’s more, CRF has indeed earned investors a profit over the long term, and it’s hard to tell people they’ve made a bad investment when they’ve made money at it!
But we still shouldn’t bite on CRF, despite its history and the fact that it has a portfolio made up of household-name American companies: Apple
Reason #1: CRF Is Overpriced
The most obvious reason not to buy CRF now is that it trades for more than it’s worth.
CRF traded at a market price above its net asset value (NAV, or the value of the assets it holds) throughout 2022, despite the selloff in the market, the fund’s portfolio and the fund’s market price. In fact, CRF’s losses were nearly double those of the broader stock market in 2022.
Why would you pay a premium for a fund that underperforms? The only reason why most folks do is that they’re lured by that high yield. But the fund’s loss last year included its dividend, so there was no safety in that payout. The fact that CRF continues to trade at a premium only amplifies its risk.
Reason #2: CRF Underperforms
As I alluded to above, CRF tends to do worse than the stock market.
CRF tries to track the S&P 500’s performance and translate its returns into big dividends. But since its yield is more than double the S&P 500’s overall annualized historical performance, CRF can’t keep up, and the value of its portfolio erodes over time. When investors see this happening, they sell, which exacerbates the problem.
Thus, CRF’s long-term returns are a fraction of the S&P 500’s, and the further back you go, the worse it gets.
Reason #3: Its “Big Yield” Doesn’t Last
Finally, let’s tackle that dividend. Since CRF’s big yield is its main draw, we want the fund to maintain its payout so we don’t take a pay cut. In reality, that’s not how things have played out.
CRF has cut payouts by over 95% since inception, with annual dividend cuts being standard operating procedure at the fund. And things are getting worse.
During the pandemic, CRF cut its dividend mostly in line with the trend established over the last decade. But suddenly in late 2022, CRF made one of the most drastic cuts in its history.
If you bought CRF three years ago, you probably felt great about your 19.7% dividend yield. But these payout cuts mean you’re now yielding just 15.8% on your original buy. That’s still a high number, but it also represents a big reduction. A million bucks in CRF just went from yielding $197,000 a year to $158,000. That’s a full $3,250 per month less—in just three years!
Plus, your million-dollar investment in CRF would now be worth just $851,000.
The takeaway: if a CEF’s high yield sounds too good to be true, it’s worth doing more digging. And CRF, beyond its high yield, gives us a good list of flaws to look for, including historical underperformance, an unsupported premium and a history of dividend cuts. If you see any or all of those warning signs, you’re best to move on.
Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report “Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10.2% Dividends.”
Disclosure: none
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelfoster/2023/01/31/this-19-dividend-will-almost-certainly-get-cut-in-2023/