Pendle Drops 85% – Buybacks Hint at Reversal

• Pendle falls 85% from ATH as price trades near $1.07 while TVL cools under weaker yield conditions in DeFi markets
• Revenue slid from $4.44M to $552K as yield compression cut PT and YT trading demand across crypto cycles
• sPENDLE model directs up to 80% revenue into buybacks, with emissions reduced and supply growth slowing overall

Pendle has fallen more than 85% from its previous cycle peak as DeFi yield conditions weaken across markets. The token now trades near $1.07 with valuation around $177 million.

Activity across its ecosystem has shifted after a strong performance period in 2025. New token mechanics and derivatives expansion continue to shape market positioning.

Pendle Price Collapse and Trading Activity Drop

Pendle price retraced from its April 2024 high of $7.50 to current levels near $1.07. The move reflects an 85.8% drawdown across the cycle. Trading activity followed the broader slowdown in yield-linked demand.

Total value locked declined to about $1.96 billion from higher levels recorded earlier. Lower funding rates in assets like sUSDe reduced appetite for yield trading positions. This shift directly impacted PT and YT activity.

Despite the decline, the protocol processed $69.8 billion in yield trades over time. Data from DeFi analytics sources shows it still holds more than half of the yield management segment. This keeps its market structure active even under lower activity conditions.

Competing protocols such as Element Finance, APWine, and Tempus reduced operations or pivoted strategies. Pendle remained the primary active platform for yield tokenization during this period.

Revenue Decline and Yield Compression Cycle

In 2025, Pendle generated $44.6 million in total fees. Average TVL stood at about $5.7 billion during the same period. Holder revenue reached $34.9 million across the year.

Momentum changed later in the cycle as monthly revenue dropped sharply. Income fell from $4.44 million in August 2025 to $552,000 by March 2026. That represents an 87.6% decline across seven months.

The slowdown aligns with yield compression across crypto markets. Lower volatility reduced demand for fixed yield positioning through PT and YT markets. This shift impacted trading frequency and fee generation.

Current run-rate estimates place revenue at a much lower base compared to peak levels. The forward pricing structure reflects a higher price-to-sales ratio near 27.35x under compressed conditions.

https://t.co/P942vLrn7g

— Emperor Osmo 🐂 🎯 (@Flowslikeosmo) April 11, 2026

sPENDLE Buyback Model and Tokenomics Shift

Pendle introduced sPENDLE as a liquid version of locked vePENDLE positions. The design allows holders to retain reward exposure while enabling liquidity. This change improves token usability across DeFi participants.

Protocol updates allocate up to 80% of revenue toward token buybacks. At current revenue levels, this equates to roughly $21 million annually. Buybacks are directed to active sPENDLE holders.

Emission adjustments reduce supply growth by 20 to 30 percent. Inflation sits near 1.89% based on current token metrics. The structure shifts reward distribution toward productive liquidity.

Net conditions show buybacks exceeding emissions by about 4.4 times. Most major token unlocks have already completed. This reduces future supply pressure under current design.

Boros Expansion and DeFi Rates Market Outlook

Boros, Pendle’s rates trading venue, recorded $11.5 billion in notional volume since launch. Open interest peaked at $270 million during its early growth phase. Fees remain limited due to early-stage scaling.

Monthly activity grew from $387 million to $2.9 billion within months. That marks a 649% increase in trading volume. 

The platform focuses on perpetual funding rate markets. It connects to a broader interest rate derivatives space measured in hundreds of trillions in notional value. This positions it within a larger financial infrastructure trend.

Recent updates from project channels point to continued expansion of rate markets across venues. Integration plans include both on-chain and off-chain instruments tied to evolving derivatives infrastructure.