MSCI Considers Reclassifying Bitcoin Treasury Firms as Funds

TLDR

  • MSCI is consulting on whether Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana treasury companies should be classified as funds rather than businesses.
  • Michael Saylor responded by emphasizing that his company operates as a traditional business, not a fund or trust.
  • The MSCI’s potential reclassification could result in companies holding large crypto reserves being removed from major equity indices.
  • Saylor highlighted that his company innovates through a unique treasury strategy rather than simply holding assets.
  • The MSCI is expected to make a final decision on the reclassification of these companies by January 15, 2025.

 

The MSCI is currently consulting on whether companies that hold large reserves of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) should be reclassified as investment funds rather than traditional businesses. This includes companies like Michael Saylor’s Strategy, which has a strategy focused on Bitcoin treasury. Saylor has reacted to the consultation, emphasizing that his company operates as a traditional business, not a fund or trust.

Saylor Responds to MSCI Consultation

Michael Saylor has publicly addressed the MSCI’s consultation on reclassifying companies that hold substantial cryptocurrency reserves. In a recent post, Saylor made it clear that their company does not align with investment funds or trusts.

“Our business is focused on creating value through innovation, not just holding assets,” he stated.

Saylor further explained that their strategy is long-term and rooted in the belief that Bitcoin is a form of “productive capital.” He noted that the company’s mission remains focused on building the “world’s first digital monetary institution” based on sound money principles and financial innovation.

The MSCI’s consultation could impact companies like Saylor’s, which hold over 50% of their reserves in cryptocurrency. If the MSCI decides that such companies should be classified as investment vehicles, they may be excluded from major equity indices like the MSCI USA and MSCI World. This would be a significant shift in how the MSCI views these companies, which are currently classified as traditional businesses.

MSCI Index Impact on Bitcoin Treasury Companies

The MSCI’s consultation may have wide-ranging effects, especially for companies like Saylor’s, which holds a substantial amount of Bitcoin in its treasury. The MSCI index typically excludes investment funds and trusts from its equity benchmarks. If the MSCI decides to reclassify companies holding crypto reserves as investment funds, these companies could face removal from the index.

Saylor emphasized that no passive fund or trust could match his company’s operations. “We are not sitting on investments; we are innovating and building a business,” he said. His company has raised billions of dollars through public offerings of digital credit securities, highlighting its active role in the financial markets.

The debate centers around the unique structure of companies like Strategy, which combines elements of software development and treasury management. These companies view Bitcoin as a tool for creating long-term value, not as a passive asset to hold. As such, they argue that their business model should not be compared to investment funds or trusts.

Ethereum and Solana Treasury Companies Also Under Scrutiny

The MSCI’s consultation could extend beyond Bitcoin treasury companies. Ethereum and Solana treasury companies, such as Tom Lee’s BitMine, may also face similar scrutiny. While these companies hold substantial crypto assets, they engage in activities like staking and running validators, which could differentiate them from traditional funds or trusts.

These activities might strengthen the case for classifying Ethereum and Solana treasury companies as businesses rather than investment vehicles. By participating in decentralized finance (DeFi) and actively managing their crypto holdings, they argue that their operations are more in line with traditional businesses than with passive investment vehicles.

However, for companies like Saylor’s, which focus on Bitcoin as their primary asset, the distinction remains more difficult to define. The MSCI’s decision will likely have a lasting impact on how the market views these unique crypto treasury strategies. The final decision from the MSCI is expected by January 15, 2025.

The MSCI’s upcoming decision on whether to reclassify Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana treasury companies will have significant implications. Companies like Saylor’s Strategy, which holds large Bitcoin reserves, could face exclusion from major indices if they are classified as investment funds. This development is one of the latest signs of how the cryptocurrency sector is evolving within traditional financial frameworks.

The post MSCI Considers Reclassifying Bitcoin Treasury Firms as Funds appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/msci-considers-reclassifying-bitcoin-treasury-firms-as-funds/