The Ending Of Netflix’s ‘The Beast In Me’ Is Such A Cop-Out

I have been enjoying the new Netflix mystery The Beast in Me, which stars Claire Danes as an author attempting to write about possible-murderer Matthew Rhys, which twists and turns its way through deceit and death.

I was enjoying it until the end, however. Spoilers follow.

The end of The Beast in Me paints Claire Danes’ Aggie into a corner, as somehow Rhys’ Niles Jarvis has planted the corpse of the man who killed her son in a car accident years earlier, after years of her threatening him. There is no evidence tying him to this kill, nor to the long-suspected death of his wife, and absolutely no one seems to know that he has beaten an FBI agent to death in the last few days. How can Aggie be exonerated at this point? How can Niles be caught at this point? It’s a compelling set-up for what you hope is going to be an epic, smart finale.

It is not that. Instead, it relies on one of the oldest tropes in murder mysteries. Aggie convinces Niles’ wife, Brittany Snow’s Nina, that Niles is definitely a murderer. This was less than brilliantly set up, as in the previous episode, we saw Nina tell Niles that his wife was an FBI informant, and the next day she disappears and allegedly commits suicide. The idea is that “she didn’t want to know,” but it’s so stupidly obvious that it’s hard to believe.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/11/17/the-ending-of-netflixs-the-beast-in-me-is-such-a-cop-out/