For years, Europe has argued about who should control financial markets: national regulators or a single authority in Brussels.
Clearinghouses, securities trading and investment supervision have all been part of the tug-of-war. Now crypto is the latest front in that contest — and perhaps the most explosive one yet.
Recemt discussions inside the European Commission indicate that policymakers are evaluating whether the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) should take charge of authorizing and monitoring crypto-asset service providers across the entire bloc, according to an article from the German news outlet FocusOnline. If the idea gains traction, national financial supervisors would no longer be the primary gatekeepers for crypto licensing.
Why Crypto Became the Flashpoint
The fight is not about ideological views on digital assets; it is about scale. Crypto companies do not operate like traditional banks anchored to a single country. Exchanges and service providers typically run global platforms — making it difficult for a single national authority to manage them.
Supporters of expanding ESMA’s power argue that Europe cannot build a genuine single crypto market if oversight is fragmented across 27 different capitals. A centralized approach could eliminate inconsistent enforcement and make it easier to take action against firms that operate across borders.
The Risk of Resetting MiCA Mid-Flight
The proposal comes at an awkward moment. The MiCA framework — built on a passporting model where authorization in one member state grants access to the whole EU — is still in the middle of rollout. Regulated firms have already spent months preparing for national licensing, forming relationships with local supervisors, and building compliance protocols.
Changing the architecture now would mean rewriting implementation plans and could delay the expected stabilization of the EU crypto regime. That is why some industry associations warn that revisiting MiCA too soon may do more harm than good.
France Pushes for Centralization, Others Fear Losing Ground
France has consistently backed the idea of ESMA taking on more responsibility for supervising major financial actors. Regulators in Italy and Austria are also leaning in that direction. Other countries, especially those whose domestic cryptocurrency industries are growing, argue that supervision is not simply a technical function — it is a strategic asset they don’t want to surrender to Brussels.
If ESMA becomes the sole licensing authority, smaller countries may lose influence over the development of their own fintech sectors.
A Debate That Will Define Europe’s Crypto Future
The European Commission is expected to publish a draft next month. Negotiations after that will determine whether crypto oversight becomes the first major financial sector in Europe to move completely under ESMA’s command.
Regardless of the outcome, the conversation marks a turning point: crypto is no longer treated as a fringe topic inside European policymaking. It has become a high-stakes arena for deciding what kind of financial union Europe wants — decentralized within member states or centralized in Brussels.
The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Source: https://coindoo.com/europe-allegedly-prepares-for-major-shake-up-in-how-crypto-firms-are-supervised/