Japan’s FSA plans to regulate crypto lending under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. This closes loopholes and mandates stronger controls.
Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) has revealed new plans. These include strengthening the regulations on crypto lending. Specifically, it is to bring crypto lending under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. As a result, existing loopholes will be closed as a result of this move.
Closing the Loopholes to Crypto Lending Regulations
The agency wants to require better risk and custody controls. This is in accordance with its objective of investor protection. Furthermore, the FSA also made proposals on the limits of investments of IEOs. This measure is aimed at preventing retail speculation.
Related Reading: South Korea Caps Crypto Lending Rates at 20% to Protect Investors | Live Bitcoin News
On the 7th the FSA held a critical meeting. It was the fifth meeting of the Financial System Council’s “Working Group on the Cryptocurrency System.” Therefore, serious discussions were conducted.
At this meeting the main focus was on strengthening regulations. The discussions revolved around cryptocurrency lending businesses. As a result, there was an indication of a clear direction. These businesses will come under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act.
Under the current system, to manage cryptocurrencies for staking, it is necessary to register. This is subject to the rules of cryptocurrency exchange business. However, there is a loophole to “borrowing” activities. If the act is structured in form of borrowing, it is not management.
This is a loophole that enables business to work without proper registration. Specifically, the FSA cited an important problem. User bear the credit risk and price fluctuation risks. However, businesses face no obligation of key
These obligations include segregating funds. They are also involving maintaining cold wallets. Therefore, unmitigated risks are exposed to users. Cases have been confirmed with service that promises high annual interest rate. Some offered rates in the 10% range.
Repayments were often restricted in long loan periods. Among such services, businesses demonstrated inadequate risk management. For instance, there was risk of defaults of loans from sub-lending recipients. Slashing (asset confiscation) at staking contractors also took place.
New Controls and Suggested Investment Caps for IEOs
The new policy will require several controls to operators. They need to create risk management systems for sub-lending. This is true for staking contractors as well. Furthermore, safe management systems for crypto assets when stored are required.
Operators must also ensure to give clear explanations of the risk to customers. Advertising is also sure to be regulated. However, loaning without public interest will be exempt. This is the case of transactions between institutional investors.
Some of the committee members expressed concern. They recognized that staking takes place on-chain by nature. As a result, they raised doubts about the proposal. Imposing regulations on the off-chain exchanges may not be consistent with market reality.
Additionally, there was a proposal in relation to Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs). It recommended investment caps on issuers that do not have financial audits. This type of framework is based on equity crowdfunding.
The purpose of this is to prevent overinvestment as a result of sales pressure. This is when an issuer is drawing funds from a wide range of investors. Specifically, in the case of equity crowdfunding, investments of exceeding ¥500,000 are limited.
These caps are capped at 5% of revenue or net assets. The maximum cap is ¥2 million. In the previous domestic IEOs, purchase amounts per investor were generally less than to Y500,000. As a result, these were responsible for more than 90% of cases.
In conclusion, Japan’s FSA is taking serious steps. It is aimed at creating a more secure and regulated crypto environment. Thus, by eliminating the loopholes in the lending practice and the IEO speculation, it aims at protecting the investors. This balance between innovation and regulation is of vital importance to Japan’s digital future.