Bitcoin resistance at $115,000 is capping upside, Shiba Inu failed to hold $0.000015 and faces support at $0.000013, while Ethereum is forming a cup pattern testing $4,800—watch volume and institutional inflows to judge breakout potential.
Bitcoin: $115,000 resistance is key; failure risks revisit of $112,000–$106,000.
Shiba Inu: rejection at $0.000015 suggests profit-taking; protect $0.000013 support.
Ethereum: cup-like pattern testing $4,800; breakout needs strong volume and flows to reach $5,000.
Bitcoin resistance at $115,000 limits upside; Shiba Inu failed at $0.000015; Ethereum cup pattern testing $4,800 — read levels to watch and next steps.
Published: 2025-09-15 | Updated: 2025-09-15 | Author/Org: COINOTAG
What is causing Bitcoin resistance at $115,000?
Bitcoin resistance at $115,000 stems from reduced trading volume and muted institutional inflows despite steady spot ETF activity. The 50-day moving average still supports price, but neutral RSI and declining volume suggest momentum is insufficient for a clean breakout toward $120,000 without larger fund commitments.
‘,
‘
🚀 Advanced Trading Tools Await You!
Maximize your potential. Join now and start trading!
‘,
‘
📈 Professional Trading Platform
Leverage advanced tools and a wide range of coins to boost your investments. Sign up now!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-bitget”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBitget”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBitget.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBitget[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBitget.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBitget”, sessperindex);
}
})();
BTC/USDT Chart by TradingView
How do spot ETF inflows affect Bitcoin’s breakout chances?
Spot ETF inflows provide gradual demand, but current inflows are steady yet modest. Large, sustained allocations from institutional funds typically create the liquidity needed for a decisive move. With present ETF numbers described as positive but limited, the odds of an immediate run-up to $120,000 remain low without bigger capital commitments.
Why did Shiba Inu fail to hold above $0.000015?
Shiba Inu’s move above $0.000015 proved to be a false breakout as sellers overwhelmed buyers at that zone. High-volume rallies were met with concentrated profit-taking and exchange inflows, indicating whales locked gains rather than increasing positions, which reversed momentum quickly and exposed short-term vulnerabilities.
What are the critical support and resistance levels for SHIB?
Key levels: resistance at $0.000015 and immediate support at $0.000013. A sustained failure to defend $0.000013 risks a drop toward $0.000012 where the 50-day moving average offers technical support. Conversely, renewed volume and consolidation could let SHIB reattempt $0.000015.
How is Ethereum’s chart pattern shaping the outlook?
Ethereum cup pattern formation appears on daily charts as ETH retests $4,800. While a cup structure can signal continuation, the pattern requires strong volume on a breakout above $5,000 to confirm. Current ETF narratives have favored Bitcoin, leaving ETH without comparable institutional traction.
‘,
‘
🔒 Secure and Fast Transactions
Diversify your investments with a wide range of coins. Join now!
‘,
‘
💎 The Easiest Way to Invest in Crypto
Dont wait to get started. Click now and discover the advantages!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-binance”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBinance”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBinance.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBinance[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBinance.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBinance”, sessperindex);
}
})();
Watch $4,800 and $5,000 closely. If ETH clears $5,000 on meaningful volume and inflows, the pattern’s bullish target becomes viable. If rejections persist, a retracement to $4,400–$4,200 is possible, supported by the 50-day moving average and recent on-chain activity trends that show slower transactional demand compared with prior surges.
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-htx”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexHtx”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesHtx.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesHtx[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesHtx.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexHtx”, sessperindex);
}
})();