The introduction of BIP177 by John Carvalho has reignited a significant debate within the Bitcoin community regarding the renaming of Bitcoin’s smallest units, challenging long-standing conventions.
This proposal underscores the tension between preserving Bitcoin’s cultural heritage and enhancing usability, especially as Bitcoin’s rising value complicates everyday transactions.
According to COINOTAG sources, “BIP177 aims to standardize Bitcoin’s unit display to improve clarity and user experience, but it faces resistance from traditionalists concerned about losing historical context.”
BIP177 sparks debate over Bitcoin unit naming, balancing cultural legacy and usability amid rising BTC prices and evolving user experience.
‘,
‘
🚀 Advanced Trading Tools Await You!
Maximize your potential. Join now and start trading!
‘,
‘
📈 Professional Trading Platform
Leverage advanced tools and a wide range of coins to boost your investments. Sign up now!
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-bitget”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBitget”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBitget.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBitget[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBitget.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBitget”, sessperindex);
}
})();
In 2025, John Carvalho, CEO of Synonym, introduced BIP177 with the objective of redefining Bitcoin’s unit nomenclature by promoting “bitcoin” as the base display unit and advocating for the adoption of “bits” over “satoshis.” This initiative seeks to simplify Bitcoin’s user interface, making it more accessible to everyday users who may find the current subunit system cumbersome. The proposal reflects a broader industry trend toward enhancing usability without altering the underlying protocol. By standardizing unit names, BIP177 aims to reduce confusion and improve clarity in transactions, particularly as Bitcoin’s price continues to climb, making fractional ownership increasingly relevant.
The Bitcoin community remains divided over BIP177’s implications. Proponents argue that adopting “bits” as a standard unit will facilitate mainstream adoption by streamlining the user experience and aligning Bitcoin with conventional financial units. Conversely, critics emphasize the importance of preserving the “satoshi” as a symbol of Bitcoin’s origin and cultural identity. This debate highlights the delicate balance between innovation and tradition, with many stakeholders advocating for a consensus-driven approach to any unit redefinition. Importantly, BIP177 does not propose changes to Bitcoin’s protocol or consensus rules, focusing solely on user interface standards, which means any adoption would be gradual and community-led.
‘
];
var adplace = document.getElementById(“ads-binance”);
if (adplace) {
var sessperindex = parseInt(sessionStorage.getItem(“adsindexBinance”));
var adsindex = isNaN(sessperindex) ? Math.floor(Math.random() * adscodesBinance.length) : sessperindex;
adplace.innerHTML = adscodesBinance[adsindex];
sessperindex = adsindex === adscodesBinance.length – 1 ? 0 : adsindex + 1;
sessionStorage.setItem(“adsindexBinance”, sessperindex);
}
})();
Source: https://en.coinotag.com/bip177-proposal-could-influence-bitcoin-unit-naming-debate-between-satoshis-and-bits/