US Court Rules Tornado Cash Smart Contracts Not Property, Lifts Ban

A U.S. appeals court has ruled that the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) exceeded its authority by sanctioning Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts. This decision overturns earlier actions taken by OFAC and removes Tornado Cash’s smart contracts from the sanctions list, allowing U.S. citizens to resume their use of the protocol.

US Court Rules Tornado Cash Smart Contracts Not Property

On November 26, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a key ruling on the legality of sanctions imposed on Tornado Cash by OFAC. The court found that the sanctions were unlawful because Tornado Cash’s smart contracts, as immutable open-source code, cannot be owned or controlled by any entity or individual.

“We hold that Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts (the lines of privacy-enabling software code) are not the ‘property’ of a foreign national or entity,” the three-judge panel stated in its decision.

The court, in addition, explained that under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), OFAC is only authorized to sanction property owned or controlled by foreign persons, which does not apply to the autonomous smart contracts.

Subsequently, the court directed a Texas district court to grant a motion for partial summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs, led by Joseph Van Loon, challenging the sanctions.

Coinbase and Privacy Advocates Applaud the Ruling

Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, described the ruling as a major win for privacy advocates and the broader crypto industry. In a social media post, Grewal stated,

“These smart contracts must now be removed from the sanctions list, and U.S. persons will once again be allowed to use this privacy-protecting protocol.”

In addition, Grewal emphasized that while preventing illicit activity is important, banning open-source technology based on its misuse by a minority of users goes beyond the scope of Treasury’s authority. He added that the court’s decision reinforces the need for a balanced approach to crypto regulation that does not stifle innovation.

Implications for Open-Source Technology

The ruling could have a significant influence on how open-source protocols are treated under U.S. law.

Consequently, by affirming that Tornado Cash’s smart contracts are not property, the court recognized the distinction between autonomous software and entities that own or control assets.

The outcome is likely to resonate across the cryptocurrency industry, as developers and advocates have long argued that open-source code should not be regulated in the same way as traditional financial institutions.

✓ Share:

Kelvin Munene Murithi

Kelvin is a distinguished writer with expertise in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s degree in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive analysis and insightful content, he possesses a strong command of English and excels in conducting thorough research and delivering timely cryptocurrency market updates.

Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.