Attorney Deaton Skeptical About Settlement

The legal tussle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has entered a crucial phase, with recent developments suggesting a complex interplay between various high-profile cases in the crypto industry. Attorney John Deaton, a notable figure in crypto law, shared his insights on the Ripple case in a recent interview on Thinking Crypto.

Deaton’s perspective highlights the SEC’s firm stance against Ripple and its reluctance to settle, especially given the broader context of the commission’s approach towards other cryptocurrencies like ADA, SOL, and MATIC.

In June, the SEC classified these cryptocurrencies as securities in its lawsuit against Coinbase, alleging the exchange operated without proper registration and facilitated trading in assets it considered investment contracts. This development has significant implications for Ripple, especially after a federal court in New York ruled in July that XRP is not a security and that Ripple’s sales and distributions did not constitute investment contracts. Despite this, the possibility of an SEC appeal or a settlement with Ripple remains a speculation among legal experts.

Ripple’s Fate Tied to Coinbase’s Legal Outcome

Attorney Deaton believes that the outcome of the Ripple case may be heavily influenced by the SEC’s legal battle with Coinbase. According to Deaton, a favorable result for Coinbase could trigger a settlement in the Ripple lawsuit. In October, Coinbase filed a motion to dismiss the SEC’s charges, challenging the classification of the traded crypto assets as investment contracts and questioning the SEC’s authority to regulate the crypto industry. The decision on this motion, expected early next year, could set a precedent impacting the Ripple case.

The Ripple lawsuit, currently in the remedies stage, is scheduled to proceed in February. The final judgment will determine the SEC’s next course of action, whether to settle with Ripple or contest the summary judgment in the Second Circuit. The intertwining of these cases underscores the complexity of the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies and the SEC’s evolving stance on digital assets.

Ripple vs. SEC Case Signals Crypto Regulation Shift

Beyond its immediate implications for Ripple and XRP, the Ripple vs. SEC case is a barometer for the regulatory climate surrounding cryptocurrencies in the United States. The SEC’s approach in these high-profile cases is being closely watched by investors, companies, and legal experts, as it could significantly influence the future of crypto regulation and the classification of digital assets.

The outcome of these cases, particularly the Ripple and Coinbase lawsuits, could provide much-needed clarity on the SEC’s regulatory boundaries and the legal status of various cryptocurrencies. As the industry awaits these crucial rulings, the tension between regulatory oversight and the dynamic nature of the crypto market continues to shape the discourse on digital asset regulation.

Read Also: What Is Tax2Gas? Will It Bring Terra Luna Classic (LUNC) And USTC Revival To $1?

✓ Share:

Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.

The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.