What is the Bitcoin Halving? How Bitcoin’s Supply is Limited.

Every four years, the amount of Bitcoin doled out to cryptocurrency miners halves in a process imaginatively known as Bitcoin halving (or halvening). Here’s why—and how—it works.

Bitcoin’s supply limit

To understand the Bitcoin halving, we must first understand the theory behind its supply.

The inventor of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, believed that scarcity could create value where there was none before. After all, there’s only one Mona Lisa, only so many Picassos, a limited supply of gold on Earth.

Bitcoin was revolutionary in that it could, for the first time, make a digital product scarce—there will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin.

The idea of limiting Bitcoin’s supply stands in marked opposition to how fiat currencies such as the U.S. dollar work. Fiat currencies initially were created with firm rules—to create one dollar, the U.S. government needed to have in reserve a certain amount of gold. This was known as the gold standard.

Over time, these rules eroded as modernizing economies, during bouts of extreme financial uncertainty–like the Great Depression and World War II–printed more money to help stimulate struggling economies. Over time, these rules evolved into today’s system, in which governments can (broadly speaking) print money whenever they’d like.

Satoshi Nakamoto believed that this devaluation of fiat money could have disastrous effects, and so, with code, prevented any single party from being able to create more Bitcoin.

What is the Bitcoin halving?

Embedded in the Bitcoin code is a hard cap of 21 million coins. New Bitcoin is released through mining as block rewards. Miners do the work of maintaining and securing the Bitcoin ledger and are rewarded with newly minted Bitcoin.

However, about every four years, the reward for mining is halved, and each halving reduces the rate at which new Bitcoin enters the supply—a process that likely will last until 2140.

A brief history

• 2009 – Bitcoin mining rewards start at 50 BTC per block.
• 2012 – The first Bitcoin halving reduces mining rewards to 25 BTC.
• 2016 – In the second halving, mining rewards go down to 12.5 BTC.
• 2020 – In the third halving, mining rewards drop to 6.25 BTC.
• 2024 — In the fourth halving, mining rewards drop to 3.125 BTC.
• 2140 – The 64th and last halving occurs and no new Bitcoin are created.

What’s so special about the halving?

If a person, group, or government is trusted to set up the money supply, they must also be trusted to not mess with it. Bitcoin is supposed to be decentralized and trustless—no one in control, and no one to trust. Since Bitcoin is not controlled by any one person or group, there must be strict rules about how much Bitcoin is created and how it’s released.

By writing a total supply and halving event into the Bitcoin code, the monetary system of Bitcoin is essentially set in stone and practically impossible to change. This “hard cap” means Bitcoin is a kind of “hard money” like gold, the supply of which is practically impossible to change.

What happens to Bitcoin miners?

Bitcoin miners invest money in specialized mining hardware as well as the electricity required to run their rigs. The cost of this is offset by their mining rewards, but what happens when their rewards are halved?

Since the halving reduces rewards, the incentive for miners to work on the Bitcoin network is also reduced, leading to fewer miners and less security for the network.

For this reason, once the last Bitcoin is mined, miners will (assuming there haven’t been any major changes to the Bitcoin protocol) receive rewards in the form of transaction fees for maintaining the network.

At present, transaction fees make up only a small proportion of a miner’s revenues—miners currently mint around 900 BTC (about $34.3 million) a day, but earn between 60 and 100 BTC ($2.2 million to $3.8 million) in daily transaction fees. That means transaction fees currently make up as little as 6.4% of a miner’s revenue—but in 2140, that’ll shoot up to 100%.

“Transaction fees will likely grow in an inverse correlation to, and as a compensation for, the diminishing mining returns,” Ben Zhou, CEO of crypto exchange ByBit, told Decrypt.

It’s also possible that the reward mechanism for Bitcoin could change before the final block is mined. Bitcoin currently runs on a proof-of-work consensus mechanism, which has attracted criticism from the likes of Tesla CEO Elon Musk for its high energy consumption.

Rival cryptocurrency Ethereum is in the process of switching from proof-of-work to the less energy-intensive proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, in which the network is secured by having validators lock up, or “stake,” their cryptocurrency. According to University College London’s Centre for Blockchain Technologies, proof-of-stake blockchains use several orders of magnitude less energy.

It’s possible Bitcoin could follow suit. In an interview originally shot for German TV show “Galileo,” Niklas Nikolajsen, the founder of Swiss crypto broker Bitcoin Suisse, was quoted as saying “I’m sure, once [proof of stake] technology is proven, that Bitcoin will adapt to it as well.”

However, despite environmentalist groups such as Greenpeace urging a switch to proof-of-stake, it remains unlikely that a sufficient number of Bitcoin validators would support any hard fork that switched the network over to an alternative consensus mechanism.

“There is virtually no chance that a hypothetical Bitcoin on PoS would be accepted as the original Bitcoin, and it’s highly improbable that it would ever come into existence,” Phil Harvey, CEO of Bitcoin mining consulting firm Sabre56, told Decrypt in response to Greenpeace’s campaign.

“Bitcoin’s use case as a sound, decentralized, immutable, uncensored, globally accessible, and self-custodied reserve currency is intrinsically connected to PoW. Its pillars, such as the halving cycles, mining economics, and block validation, all rely on this consensus mechanism,” Harvey said. “Introducing PoS to the Bitcoin network would change its entire identity and value proposition.”

Price impact

The debate over whether Bitcoin halvings affect the cryptocurrency’s price, or whether they’re already “priced in,” continues to rage.

According to the laws of supply and demand, the dwindling Bitcoin supply should increase demand for Bitcoin, and would presumably push up prices. One theory, known as the stock-to-flow model, calculates a ratio based on the current supply of Bitcoin and how much is entering circulation, with each halving (unsurprisingly) having an impact on that ratio. However, others have disputed the underlying assumptions upon which the theory is based.

Historically, after previous halving events, the price of Bitcoin has increased—but not immediately, and other factors have played a part.

At the time of the June 2016 halving, the price of Bitcoin was around $660; following the halving, Bitcoin continued to trade horizontally until the end of the month, before falling as low as $533 in August. But then Bitcoin’s price shot up to its then-all-time high of over $20,000 by the end of the year, an increase of 2,916%.

Similarly, in the wake of the 2020 halving, Bitcoin’s price increased from just over $9,000 to over $27,000 by the end of the year—but in the two months following the halving, the price didn’t break $10,000. It’s also important to note that other factors influenced Bitcoin’s 2020 bull run, most notably growing institutional investment from the likes of MicroStrategy, and PayPal’s decision to enable its users to buy and hold Bitcoin.